Agentic Web Census

August 2026by Omitsis

English

Technologies · August 2026

Which Font scripts is readiest for AI agents?

13 measured, averaging 14.2% against 19.9% for the web overall. Technologies that control how fonts are displayed on a webpage

Best first

How to read these figures

The colour says what a bar IS, not how it scores: the accent is the one this page is about, grey is everything it is compared with, and the hollow bar is the web overall — the ruler, not a rival. Whether a figure is above or below the rest of the web is in the number and in the arrow beside it.

Every figure here comes from a sample, not from counting every site — so it carries a margin: how much it could move if we had happened to sample different pages. A figure measured on a thousand pages has a wide margin; one measured on a hundred thousand has a narrow one. It matters for one thing: two figures that differ by less than the wider of their margins are not one above the other, they are tied. That is why nothing here has a position number.

TechnologyAWCSMonth by month
Fork Awesome

Fork Awesome

Sample
n=2
Coverage
100.0%
Margin
±37.48
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±37.48 are tied, not ranked.

Fork Awesome scores 26.7%26.7%
Fork Awesome: 2 months, no significant change= +26.7
Bunny Fonts

Bunny Fonts

Sample
n=68
Coverage
95.8%
Margin
±6.43
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±6.43 are tied, not ranked.

Bunny Fonts scores 24.3%24.3%
Bunny Fonts: 4 months, no significant change= −3.8
Google Font API

Google Font API

Sample
n=5,996
Coverage
95.9%
Margin
±0.68
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±0.68 are tied, not ranked.

Google Font API scores 17.7%17.7%
Google Font API: 4 months, up▲ +1.9
Typekit

Typekit

Sample
n=470
Coverage
97.1%
Margin
±2.44
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±2.44 are tied, not ranked.

Typekit scores 17.5%17.5%
Typekit: 4 months, no significant change= +2.1
Glyphicons

Glyphicons

Sample
n=9
Coverage
100.0%
Margin
±17.67
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±17.67 are tied, not ranked.

Glyphicons scores 16.8%16.8%
Glyphicons: 4 months, no significant change= +16.8
Bootstrap Icons

Bootstrap Icons

Sample
n=147
Coverage
96.7%
Margin
±4.37
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±4.37 are tied, not ranked.

Bootstrap Icons scores 15.5%15.5%
Bootstrap Icons: 4 months, no significant change= −0.2
Twitter Emoji (Twemoji)

Twitter Emoji (Twemoji)

Sample
n=2,132
Coverage
94.7%
Margin
±1.15
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±1.15 are tied, not ranked.

Twitter Emoji (Twemoji) scores 13.5%13.5%
Twitter Emoji (Twemoji): 4 months, no significant change= +0.3
Font Awesome

Font Awesome

Sample
n=2,667
Coverage
95.6%
Margin
±1.03
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±1.03 are tied, not ranked.

Font Awesome scores 12.7%12.7%
Font Awesome: 4 months, up▲ +1.7
Custom Fonts

Custom Fonts

Sample
n=33
Coverage
100.0%
Margin
±9.23
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±9.23 are tied, not ranked.

Custom Fonts scores 12.5%12.5%
Custom Fonts: 4 months, no significant change= −0.4
Ionicons

Ionicons

Sample
n=75
Coverage
89.3%
Margin
±6.12
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±6.12 are tied, not ranked.

Ionicons scores 10.9%10.9%
Ionicons: 4 months, no significant change= +2.4
Hoefler&Co

Hoefler&Co

Sample
n=5
Coverage
100.0%
Margin
±23.70
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±23.70 are tied, not ranked.

Hoefler&Co scores 10.3%10.3%
Hoefler&Co: 4 months, no significant change= −16.4
Cufon

Cufon

Sample
n=8
Coverage
100.0%
Margin
±18.74
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±18.74 are tied, not ranked.

Cufon scores 5.9%5.9%
Cufon: 4 months, no significant change= +5.9
MyFonts

MyFonts

Sample
n=1
Coverage
100.0%
Margin
±53.00
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±53.00 are tied, not ranked.

MyFonts scores 0.0%0.0%
MyFonts: 4 months, no significant change= 0.0