Agentic Web Census

August 2026by Omitsis

English

Technologies · August 2026

Which Fundraising & donations is readiest for AI agents?

13 measured, averaging 17.7% against 19.9% for the web overall. Tools that facilitate online charitable contributions

Best first

How to read these figures

The colour says what a bar IS, not how it scores: the accent is the one this page is about, grey is everything it is compared with, and the hollow bar is the web overall — the ruler, not a rival. Whether a figure is above or below the rest of the web is in the number and in the arrow beside it.

Every figure here comes from a sample, not from counting every site — so it carries a margin: how much it could move if we had happened to sample different pages. A figure measured on a thousand pages has a wide margin; one measured on a hundred thousand has a narrow one. It matters for one thing: two figures that differ by less than the wider of their margins are not one above the other, they are tied. That is why nothing here has a position number.

TechnologyAWCSMonth by month
Kindful

Kindful

Sample
n=1
Coverage
100.0%
Margin
±53.00
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±53.00 are tied, not ranked.

Kindful scores 53.3%53.3%
Kindful: 4 months, up▲ +53.3
Virtuous

Virtuous

Sample
n=1
Coverage
100.0%
Margin
±53.00
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±53.00 are tied, not ranked.

Virtuous scores 43.9%43.9%
—
ActBlue

ActBlue

Sample
n=3
Coverage
100.0%
Margin
±30.60
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±30.60 are tied, not ranked.

ActBlue scores 33.3%33.3%
ActBlue: 4 months, no significant change= +23.7
Ko-fi

Ko-fi

Sample
n=8
Coverage
100.0%
Margin
±18.74
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±18.74 are tied, not ranked.

Ko-fi scores 31.4%31.4%
Ko-fi: 4 months, no significant change= −5.8
Fundraise Up

Fundraise Up

Sample
n=7
Coverage
100.0%
Margin
±20.03
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±20.03 are tied, not ranked.

Fundraise Up scores 29.7%29.7%
Fundraise Up: 4 months, no significant change= −10.3
Network for Good

Network for Good

Sample
n=1
Coverage
100.0%
Margin
±53.00
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±53.00 are tied, not ranked.

Network for Good scores 26.7%26.7%
Network for Good: 3 months, no significant change= −16.9
GiveWP

GiveWP

Sample
n=13
Coverage
100.0%
Margin
±14.70
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±14.70 are tied, not ranked.

GiveWP scores 11.9%11.9%
GiveWP: 4 months, no significant change= +8.8
Buy me a coffee

Buy me a coffee

Sample
n=3
Coverage
100.0%
Margin
±30.60
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±30.60 are tied, not ranked.

Buy me a coffee scores 0.0%0.0%
Buy me a coffee: 4 months, no significant change= −10.3
Donorbox

Donorbox

Sample
n=2
Coverage
66.7%
Margin
±37.48
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±37.48 are tied, not ranked.

Donorbox scores 0.0%0.0%
Donorbox: 4 months, no significant change= −10.1
DonorPerfect

DonorPerfect

Sample
n=1
Coverage
100.0%
Margin
±53.00
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±53.00 are tied, not ranked.

DonorPerfect scores 0.0%0.0%
DonorPerfect: 4 months, no significant change= 0.0
EveryAction

EveryAction

Sample
n=1
Coverage
100.0%
Margin
±53.00
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±53.00 are tied, not ranked.

EveryAction scores 0.0%0.0%
—
GivingFuel

GivingFuel

Sample
n=1
Coverage
100.0%
Margin
±53.00
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±53.00 are tied, not ranked.

GivingFuel scores 0.0%0.0%
—
Qgiv

Qgiv

Sample
n=1
Coverage
100.0%
Margin
±53.00
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±53.00 are tied, not ranked.

Qgiv scores 0.0%0.0%
Qgiv: 3 months, no significant change= −13.3