Best first

How to read these figures

The colour says what a bar IS, not how it scores: the accent is the one this page is about, grey is everything it is compared with, and the hollow bar is the web overall — the ruler, not a rival. Whether a figure is above or below the rest of the web is in the number and in the arrow beside it.

Every figure here comes from a sample, not from counting every site — so it carries a margin: how much it could move if we had happened to sample different pages. A figure measured on a thousand pages has a wide margin; one measured on a hundred thousand has a narrow one. It matters for one thing: two figures that differ by less than the wider of their margins are not one above the other, they are tied. That is why nothing here has a position number.

TechnologyAWCSMonth by month
Application Request Routing

Application Request Routing

Sample
n=5
Coverage
100.0%
Margin
±23.70
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±23.70 are tied, not ranked.

Application Request Routing scores 32.5%32.5%
Application Request Routing: 4 months, no significant change= +19.2
Azure Front Door

Azure Front Door

Sample
n=33
Coverage
97.1%
Margin
±9.23
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±9.23 are tied, not ranked.

Azure Front Door scores 19.4%19.4%
Azure Front Door: 4 months, no significant change= −1.9
Amazon ALB

Amazon ALB

Sample
n=258
Coverage
94.8%
Margin
±3.30
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±3.30 are tied, not ranked.

Amazon ALB scores 17.9%17.9%
Amazon ALB: 4 months, no significant change= −2.5
Amazon ELB

Amazon ELB

Sample
n=14
Coverage
100.0%
Margin
±14.16
The web overall
19.9%

Two figures closer together than ±14.16 are tied, not ranked.

Amazon ELB scores 9.7%9.7%
Amazon ELB: 4 months, no significant change= −11.7