Poor12.8%

AWCS

What the AWCS is, and how it is measured

The figures the index is made of, with their own series: a technology whose index is flat can still have moved on one dimension.

Measured on 1,869 pages, 96.2% of which carried the agentic category, with a confidence margin of ±1.23.

= −0.1
AWCS over 4 months

10.5%12.8%

Read

What Read measures

Lighthouse builds the accessibility tree an agent would traverse and scores the page pass or fail. The denominator is only the pages the audit could evaluate: a notApplicable or an error is excluded rather than counted as a failure, and the fraction that could be evaluated is published beside it as the coverage.

n=1,869 · coverage 96.2% · margin ±1.23 pp.

53% of the score
Read on its full scale

Poor19.5%

Read: 4 months, no significant change= −0.2 pp
Guide

What Guide measures

The llms-txt audit passing: a file is served AND Lighthouse considers it valid. The denominator is every sampled page, so this is a fraction of the whole web and not of the sites that have a file. This is the figure the index uses, because a broken file does not guide an agent.

n=1,942 · coverage 100.0% · margin ±1.20 pp.

27% of the score
Guide on its full scale

Very poor9.6%

Guide: 4 months, no significant change= −0.1 pp
Act

What Act measures

A count, not a percentage: how many sampled sites register WebMCP tools that an agent can call. It is the audit that defines the Act dimension — the other two WebMCP audits measure how good those tools are, not whether they exist.

n=1,869 · coverage 96.2% · margin ±1.23 pp.

20% of the score
Act on its full scale

Very poor0.0%

Act: 4 months, no significant change= 0.0 pp
Reachable

What Reachable measures

Read from the robots.txt of the sampled sites: of the AI agents we track, how many are NOT disallowed. Gradual and not a yes or no — turning away one agent out of seventeen is not the same as turning away all of them. A site with no robots.txt blocks nobody, so it counts as fully reachable: that is a measurement, not a gap. This is the only figure that MULTIPLIES the index instead of adding to it, because it is a precondition: if an agent cannot fetch the page, nothing else about the page matters. One caveat we would rather state than hide: a blanket Disallow under User-agent: * is not counted, because the corpus-wide measurement cannot see it either, and we would rather be consistent than clever.

n=1,942 · coverage 100.0% · margin ±1.20 pp.

multiplies the rest
Reachable on its full scale

Excellent98.3%

Reachable: 4 months, no significant change= +0.3 pp

By major version

Does upgrading help? 26 majors of Yoast SEO clear the sample gate, oldest first. Each one is measured on its own sites, so a version with few of them carries a wide margin — the tooltip has it.

Yoast SEO 1

What Yoast SEO 1 measures

The AWCS of the sites where Yoast SEO 1 was detected, on its own sample. Swapping one version for another does not change a site by itself — this says what sites on that version score, which is what makes «does upgrading help?» answerable at all.

n=1 · coverage 100.0% · margin ±53.00.

Yoast SEO 1 on its full scale

Very poor0.0%

Yoast SEO 1: 3 months, no significant change= 0.0
Yoast SEO 2

What Yoast SEO 2 measures

The AWCS of the sites where Yoast SEO 2 was detected, on its own sample. Swapping one version for another does not change a site by itself — this says what sites on that version score, which is what makes «does upgrading help?» answerable at all.

n=1 · coverage 100.0% · margin ±53.00.

Yoast SEO 2 on its full scale

Very poor0.0%

Yoast SEO 2: 3 months, no significant change= 0.0
Yoast SEO 3

What Yoast SEO 3 measures

The AWCS of the sites where Yoast SEO 3 was detected, on its own sample. Swapping one version for another does not change a site by itself — this says what sites on that version score, which is what makes «does upgrading help?» answerable at all.

n=4 · coverage 100.0% · margin ±26.50.

Yoast SEO 3 on its full scale

Weak26.7%

Yoast SEO 3: 4 months, no significant change= −8.9
Yoast SEO 4

What Yoast SEO 4 measures

The AWCS of the sites where Yoast SEO 4 was detected, on its own sample. Swapping one version for another does not change a site by itself — this says what sites on that version score, which is what makes «does upgrading help?» answerable at all.

n=3 · coverage 100.0% · margin ±30.60.

Yoast SEO 4 on its full scale

Very poor0.0%

Yoast SEO 4: 4 months, no significant change= 0.0
Yoast SEO 5

What Yoast SEO 5 measures

The AWCS of the sites where Yoast SEO 5 was detected, on its own sample. Swapping one version for another does not change a site by itself — this says what sites on that version score, which is what makes «does upgrading help?» answerable at all.

n=2 · coverage 100.0% · margin ±37.48.

Yoast SEO 5 on its full scale

Very poor0.0%

Yoast SEO 5: 4 months, no significant change= 0.0
Yoast SEO 6

What Yoast SEO 6 measures

The AWCS of the sites where Yoast SEO 6 was detected, on its own sample. Swapping one version for another does not change a site by itself — this says what sites on that version score, which is what makes «does upgrading help?» answerable at all.

n=1 · coverage 100.0% · margin ±53.00.

Yoast SEO 6 on its full scale

Very poor0.0%

Yoast SEO 6: 3 months, no significant change= −26.7
Yoast SEO 7

What Yoast SEO 7 measures

The AWCS of the sites where Yoast SEO 7 was detected, on its own sample. Swapping one version for another does not change a site by itself — this says what sites on that version score, which is what makes «does upgrading help?» answerable at all.

n=2 · coverage 100.0% · margin ±37.48.

Yoast SEO 7 on its full scale

Very poor0.0%

Yoast SEO 7: 4 months, no significant change= 0.0
Yoast SEO 9

What Yoast SEO 9 measures

The AWCS of the sites where Yoast SEO 9 was detected, on its own sample. Swapping one version for another does not change a site by itself — this says what sites on that version score, which is what makes «does upgrading help?» answerable at all.

n=7 · coverage 100.0% · margin ±20.03.

Yoast SEO 9 on its full scale

Very poor0.0%

Yoast SEO 9: 4 months, no significant change= −13.3
Yoast SEO 11

What Yoast SEO 11 measures

The AWCS of the sites where Yoast SEO 11 was detected, on its own sample. Swapping one version for another does not change a site by itself — this says what sites on that version score, which is what makes «does upgrading help?» answerable at all.

n=24 · coverage 100.0% · margin ±10.82.

Yoast SEO 11 on its full scale

Very poor8.9%

Yoast SEO 11: 4 months, no significant change= −4.4
Yoast SEO 12

What Yoast SEO 12 measures

The AWCS of the sites where Yoast SEO 12 was detected, on its own sample. Swapping one version for another does not change a site by itself — this says what sites on that version score, which is what makes «does upgrading help?» answerable at all.

n=5 · coverage 100.0% · margin ±23.70.

Yoast SEO 12 on its full scale

Very poor0.0%

Yoast SEO 12: 4 months, no significant change= −17.8
Yoast SEO 13

What Yoast SEO 13 measures

The AWCS of the sites where Yoast SEO 13 was detected, on its own sample. Swapping one version for another does not change a site by itself — this says what sites on that version score, which is what makes «does upgrading help?» answerable at all.

n=6 · coverage 100.0% · margin ±21.64.

Yoast SEO 13 on its full scale

Very poor0.0%

Yoast SEO 13: 4 months, no significant change= 0.0
Yoast SEO 14

What Yoast SEO 14 measures

The AWCS of the sites where Yoast SEO 14 was detected, on its own sample. Swapping one version for another does not change a site by itself — this says what sites on that version score, which is what makes «does upgrading help?» answerable at all.

n=8 · coverage 100.0% · margin ±18.74.

Yoast SEO 14 on its full scale

Very poor6.7%

Yoast SEO 14: 4 months, no significant change= +2.6
Yoast SEO 15

What Yoast SEO 15 measures

The AWCS of the sites where Yoast SEO 15 was detected, on its own sample. Swapping one version for another does not change a site by itself — this says what sites on that version score, which is what makes «does upgrading help?» answerable at all.

n=16 · coverage 100.0% · margin ±13.25.

Yoast SEO 15 on its full scale

Very poor9.7%

Yoast SEO 15: 4 months, no significant change= +5.3
Yoast SEO 16

What Yoast SEO 16 measures

The AWCS of the sites where Yoast SEO 16 was detected, on its own sample. Swapping one version for another does not change a site by itself — this says what sites on that version score, which is what makes «does upgrading help?» answerable at all.

n=7 · coverage 100.0% · margin ±20.03.

Yoast SEO 16 on its full scale

Poor15.2%

Yoast SEO 16: 4 months, no significant change= −2.5
Yoast SEO 17

What Yoast SEO 17 measures

The AWCS of the sites where Yoast SEO 17 was detected, on its own sample. Swapping one version for another does not change a site by itself — this says what sites on that version score, which is what makes «does upgrading help?» answerable at all.

n=8 · coverage 100.0% · margin ±18.74.

Yoast SEO 17 on its full scale

Very poor6.7%

Yoast SEO 17: 4 months, no significant change= +6.7
Yoast SEO 18

What Yoast SEO 18 measures

The AWCS of the sites where Yoast SEO 18 was detected, on its own sample. Swapping one version for another does not change a site by itself — this says what sites on that version score, which is what makes «does upgrading help?» answerable at all.

n=20 · coverage 100.0% · margin ±11.85.

Yoast SEO 18 on its full scale

Very poor8.0%

Yoast SEO 18: 4 months, no significant change= +4.7
Yoast SEO 19

What Yoast SEO 19 measures

The AWCS of the sites where Yoast SEO 19 was detected, on its own sample. Swapping one version for another does not change a site by itself — this says what sites on that version score, which is what makes «does upgrading help?» answerable at all.

n=32 · coverage 100.0% · margin ±9.37.

Yoast SEO 19 on its full scale

Very poor4.2%

Yoast SEO 19: 4 months, no significant change= −3.5
Yoast SEO 20

What Yoast SEO 20 measures

The AWCS of the sites where Yoast SEO 20 was detected, on its own sample. Swapping one version for another does not change a site by itself — this says what sites on that version score, which is what makes «does upgrading help?» answerable at all.

n=31 · coverage 96.9% · margin ±9.52.

Yoast SEO 20 on its full scale

Very poor3.4%

Yoast SEO 20: 4 months, no significant change= −6.3
Yoast SEO 21

What Yoast SEO 21 measures

The AWCS of the sites where Yoast SEO 21 was detected, on its own sample. Swapping one version for another does not change a site by itself — this says what sites on that version score, which is what makes «does upgrading help?» answerable at all.

n=35 · coverage 97.2% · margin ±8.96.

Yoast SEO 21 on its full scale

Very poor7.6%

Yoast SEO 21: 4 months, no significant change= +0.5
Yoast SEO 22

What Yoast SEO 22 measures

The AWCS of the sites where Yoast SEO 22 was detected, on its own sample. Swapping one version for another does not change a site by itself — this says what sites on that version score, which is what makes «does upgrading help?» answerable at all.

n=32 · coverage 97.0% · margin ±9.37.

Yoast SEO 22 on its full scale

Poor12.3%

Yoast SEO 22: 4 months, no significant change= +6.8
Yoast SEO 23

What Yoast SEO 23 measures

The AWCS of the sites where Yoast SEO 23 was detected, on its own sample. Swapping one version for another does not change a site by itself — this says what sites on that version score, which is what makes «does upgrading help?» answerable at all.

n=41 · coverage 95.3% · margin ±8.28.

Yoast SEO 23 on its full scale

Very poor9.1%

Yoast SEO 23: 4 months, no significant change= −0.0
Yoast SEO 24

What Yoast SEO 24 measures

The AWCS of the sites where Yoast SEO 24 was detected, on its own sample. Swapping one version for another does not change a site by itself — this says what sites on that version score, which is what makes «does upgrading help?» answerable at all.

n=68 · coverage 98.6% · margin ±6.43.

Yoast SEO 24 on its full scale

Very poor6.2%

Yoast SEO 24: 4 months, no significant change= −4.4
Yoast SEO 25

What Yoast SEO 25 measures

The AWCS of the sites where Yoast SEO 25 was detected, on its own sample. Swapping one version for another does not change a site by itself — this says what sites on that version score, which is what makes «does upgrading help?» answerable at all.

n=61 · coverage 93.8% · margin ±6.79.

Yoast SEO 25 on its full scale

Very poor6.5%

Yoast SEO 25: 4 months, no significant change= −0.9
Yoast SEO 26

What Yoast SEO 26 measures

The AWCS of the sites where Yoast SEO 26 was detected, on its own sample. Swapping one version for another does not change a site by itself — this says what sites on that version score, which is what makes «does upgrading help?» answerable at all.

n=93 · coverage 97.9% · margin ±5.50.

Yoast SEO 26 on its full scale

Very poor9.9%

Yoast SEO 26: 4 months, no significant change= −0.3
Yoast SEO 27

What Yoast SEO 27 measures

The AWCS of the sites where Yoast SEO 27 was detected, on its own sample. Swapping one version for another does not change a site by itself — this says what sites on that version score, which is what makes «does upgrading help?» answerable at all.

n=232 · coverage 97.9% · margin ±3.48.

Yoast SEO 27 on its full scale

Poor12.2%

Yoast SEO 27: 4 months, no significant change= −3.2
Yoast SEO 28

What Yoast SEO 28 measures

The AWCS of the sites where Yoast SEO 28 was detected, on its own sample. Swapping one version for another does not change a site by itself — this says what sites on that version score, which is what makes «does upgrading help?» answerable at all.

n=903 · coverage 95.0% · margin ±1.76.

Yoast SEO 28 on its full scale

Poor15.0%

Yoast SEO 28: 2 months, no significant change= +0.1

Measured, and not part of the index

These are signals, not scores. They are kept apart on purpose: mixed in with the dimensions, a low one reads as a bad grade for something the index never counted.

51.4%
Google's category score

Google's category score

Sample
n=1,868
Coverage
96.2%

The score Lighthouse gives the agentic-browsing category, read from the report as published. We republish it as a declared reference and never as a figure of ours: it includes cumulative-layout-shift — a rendering metric — at half the weight, and its weights are conditional and undocumented. A number whose calculation we do not control is not a number we cite as our own.

Google's category score: 4 months, no significant change= +0.2
5.0%
Sites with an AI crawler policy

Sites with an AI crawler policy

Sample
n=1,942
Coverage
100.0%

Not a Lighthouse audit: it is read from the robots.txt of the sampled sites, checking whether the file names any of the AI crawlers we track. It measures HAVING AN EXPLICIT POLICY and not permitting: blocking AI crawlers is a legitimate decision, and penalising it would be a value judgement dressed up as a measurement. What is a sign of maturity is having decided.

Sites with an AI crawler policy: 4 months, no significant change= −0.2 pp
34.0%
Sites serving an llms.txt

Sites serving an llms.txt

Sample
n=1,942
Coverage
100.0%

The same llms-txt audit as the figure below, read differently: this one counts SOMETHING being served at /llms.txt, valid or not. Read that literally, because the distance between the two figures is large and it is the interesting part: of the pages that serve something, fewer than two in five serve a file that parses. Our reading — and we cannot verify it without fetching those files ourselves, which we do not do — is that a good share of the rest are soft 404s: a server answering 200 with an HTML error page. So the figure to cite is the valid one below, and this one is best read as an upper bound. Pages whose audit errored are excluded from both, and the coverage says how many that was.

Sites serving an llms.txt: 4 months, no significant change= +0.9 pp

Against the rest of SEO

The 10 technologies in this category with a published index, and the web overall for scale. Yoast SEO is the highlighted bar.

Alli
Alli: 80.0%
80.0%
Avada SEO
Avada SEO: 46.7%
46.7%
Yoast SEO for Shopify
Yoast SEO for Shopify: 46.7%
46.7%
BrightEdge
BrightEdge: 26.7%
26.7%
All in One SEO
All in One SEO: 25.8%
25.8%
SEOmatic
SEOmatic: 25.5%
25.5%
All sites
All sites: 19.9%
19.9%
RankMath SEO
RankMath SEO: 16.6%
16.6%
Yoast SEO Premium
Yoast SEO Premium: 13.2%
13.2%
The SEO Framework
The SEO Framework: 12.8%
12.8%
Yoast SEO
Yoast SEO: 12.8%
12.8%
00.250.500.751.0
Every SEO technology the census can publish, against the web overall (19.9%). The scale is always 0–1.

What else we measure here

51.4%
Google's category score

Google's category score

Sample
n=1,868
Coverage
96.2%
5.0%
Sites with an AI crawler policy

Sites with an AI crawler policy

Sample
n=1,942
Coverage
100.0%
98.3%
Agents that can reach the site

Agents that can reach the site

Sample
n=1,942
Coverage
100.0%
19.5%
Pages an agent can parse

Pages an agent can parse

Sample
n=1,869
Coverage
96.2%
34.0%
Sites serving an llms.txt

Sites serving an llms.txt

Sample
n=1,942
Coverage
100.0%
9.6%
Sites with a valid llms.txt

Sites with a valid llms.txt

Sample
n=1,942
Coverage
100.0%
0
Sites exposing tools

Sites exposing tools

Sample
n=1,869
Coverage
96.2%

How this was measured