Valid tool schemas across the web

Sites whose WebMCP tools declare a schema that validates. It has not measurably changed since July 2026: the gap between the two is inside the margin.

Excellent98.8%

Valid tool schemas in August 2026

What the Valid tool schemas in August 2026 is, and how it is measured

Measured on 735 pages, 4.9% of which carried the agentic category, with a confidence margin of ±1.95 pp.

= +1.8 pp

97.0%98.8%

Valid tool schemas, July 2026 to August 2026, one measurement a month. The last step was inside the margin, so it is a tie.

What this measures

Lighthouse audit: webmcp-schema-validity

Of the sites that register WebMCP tools, those whose tools declare a schema that validates. An agent can call a tool without a schema but does not know what with. Informative mode too, so it is invisible to the category score.

Who moved

How to read these figures

Every figure here comes from a sample, not from counting every site — so it carries a margin: how much it could move if we had happened to sample different pages. A figure measured on a thousand pages has a wide margin; one measured on a hundred thousand has a narrow one. It matters for one thing: two figures that differ by less than the wider of their margins are not one above the other, they are tied. That is why nothing here has a position number.

How many actually moved

0 of the 1 segments measured on both months moved by more than their margin. The other 1 did not move: their difference is smaller than this sample can resolve. All of them are in the table below.

Nobody moved

Every one of the 1 segments stayed inside its margin. The figure for the web overall can still move while none of its parts do — the corpus is measured on far more pages than any single segment, so it resolves smaller changes.

From Omitsis, who publish this census

See where your site sits on this figure

We measure it against this census and tell you what to change first.

Leave it to us